Installation issues with Docker and containers

Hello,

Despite a working ping via SSH, I am unable to start the installation of Docker and containers.

SSH response: no internet.

Do you have any idea about the configuration that might be missing in WBM?

IP forwarding through interfaces is enabled, and the gateway is declared.

Did you remember to configure a DNS Server in the WBM? And if so, can you verify it is working by pinging www.google.com instead of 8.8.8.8?

Hello Adam,

it didn’t work with www.google.com , so i restarted the PLC , valid all the differents options enabling all the login password in ssh and network services .

Now it’s good, but i can only run the container for grafana (port 3000)

Port 1880 for nodered doesn’t work , 8086 for influxdb doesn’t too.

I don’t remember the port number for portainer IO.

But there is no explications how to run all of thoses portainer on https://supportwago.fr/index.php

The IOT docker tool ( /home/sysapp_fr/docker_tool/install) run well the installtion of the containers on the sd card, but thats all .

I succeded few month ago to install (with the help of a unix engeneer) and to run nodered , influxdb, and grafana on raspberry pi 3 and i remember it was difficult with command lines, so i expected that it would be easier with portainer (web browser access) but not at all.

, but it works fine only with grafana.

Is it a problem of security with the diffrent ports ? is there a tutorial to use portainer , for the settings of volum etc.. for influxdb ?

If you can successfully pull the node-red image, the issue probably lies in your docker run command. Did you remember to include the " -p 1880:1880 " option?

Here is the command I usually use:
docker run -d -p 1880:1880 --restart unless-stopped -v mynodereddata:/data --user=root --privileged=true nodered/node-red

Adam,

It dosn’t work anymore.

It’s still with linux command lines.

I thought that was graphicaly with webserveur portainer io , that we had to install containers.

Hello , even with firewalls deactivated , there is a problem of connection to portainer IO, when connected to http://192.168.x.y:9443

Wich settings or command line do I have to modify ?

a docker instruction gives :slight_smile: the result below. So portainer is running . But why I unable to login with webbrowser url https://IPadress:9443 ?

The portainer page says the problem : your portainer instance timed out for security purposes.

When you run portainer from a fresh install, you need to login and create your first password within a certain amount of time. Otherwise it will be shutdown for security purpose.
Restart your container (docker restart c_portainer) and try to log in again.

Thank you Quentin,

Now it’s work .

Now I have to find a tutorial to perform the installation and the
settings of influxdb and grafana in portainer.

Unfortunetly , I noticed the wbm interface is very low speed, now when a
codesys project is downloaded.

Does docker and the installation of differents containers reduce the
speed of the system ? (PFC 8212).

Does a PFC300 would improve that issue ?

signature4

Jean-François Baratte

Of course, CPU load will be impacted by the use of containers.

The PFC300 has a much larger performance thanks to its 64 bits CPU, dual core 1.4 GHz.
It also has much more RAM, and the 20 Go flash memory will allow you to use the containers directly within the flash instead of using the SD card.

Thnak you for thoses informations.

How do you choose between BC100 or PFC200 8212 , or even PC300 if you
have a codesys program and docker and several containers as grafana and
influxdb?

Is there a calculation to do ?

Regards

BC100 doesn’t support Docker.
As I mention PFC300 has a outstanding performance, and the price difference isn’t big with a PFC200.
I would recommend to use PFC300 as soon as a Docker container is involved.